Les Thinking Fast and Slow Diaries
Les Thinking Fast and Slow Diaries
Blog Article
Where to begin... I have a number of theories running around in my head, and occasionally I try to corral them on paper. I organize, sequence and interconnect them in a way that will prevent my reader from meaningfully widening their eyes, in année aside, while winding their finger around Nous ear.
I think this book is mistitled. Conscience years, I assumed that it was some kind of self-help book embout when to trust your gut and when to trust your head, and thus I put hors champ reading it. Plaisant Thinking, Fast and Slow is nothing of the destinée.
Is he more likely to Lorsque a librarian pépite a farmer? Now consider the answer that springs to mind (librarian, I assume): how was it generated? Your mind compared the figure to the stereotype of a librarian, and made the judgment. Plaisant this judgment did not take into account the fact that there are many times more farmers than male librarians.
Also posted nous Kara.Reviews, where you can easily browse all my reviews and subscribe to my digest Lettre.
However, often we should not rely nous-mêmes this couture of reasoning, especially when making sérieux decisions, such as choosing an insurance or retirement maquette. System 2, ready to thoroughly décomposition facts and compare different sélection, is at our disposal to help make choices that are going to have a substantial impact on our direct. The tricky bout is that to be able to Termes conseillés between the two systems humans have at least to make an concours to distinguish between them. The best option seems to let these two goût cooperate, ravissant it is not as easy as one might think.
Whether professionals have a chance to develop intuitive appréciation depends essentially on the quality and speed of feedback, as well as nous-mêmes sufficient opportunity to practice.
Another interesting apparence is what he calls "hedonic" theory. Our memories of pleasant and unpleasant experiences are very much colored by their peak intensities and their ends--plaisant definitely not by their durations. In other words, a short, very unpleasant experience is remembered as being much worse than année very longitudinal duration, unpleasant experience.
I had taken Nisbett’s and Morewedge’s épreuve nous a computer screen, not nous paper, but the repère remains. It’s Nous thing cognition the effects of training to vue up in the form of improved results nous a expérience—when you’re nous your guard, maybe even looking cognition tricks—and quite another connaissance the effects to scène up in the form of real-life behavior.
The substance of intuitive heuristics: when faced with a difficult Demande, we often answer an easier Je instead, usually without noticing the relève.
” (86). Absolutely essentially intuition not getting eaten by lurking monsters, and “explains why we can think fast, and how we are able to make sentiment of partial récente in a complex world. Much of the time, the coherent story we put together is close enough to reality to pylône reasonable Opération.” Except when it doesn’t. Like in our comparative risk assessments. We panic about shark attacks and fail to fear riptides; freak out embout novel and unusual risks and opportunities and undervalue the pervasive ones.
That state of affairs led a scholar named Hal Hershfield to play around with photographs. Hershfield is a marketing professor at UCLA whose research starts from the idea that people are “estranged” from their future self. As a result, he explained in a 2011 paper, “saving is like a choice between spending money today pépite giving it to a stranger years from now.” The paper described an attempt by Hershfield and several colleagues to modify that state of mind in their students.
However, right next to it was another row of water slow and fast thinking bottles, and clearly the mechanism in that row was in order. My instinct was to not buy a bottle from the “good” row, parce que $4 expérience a bottle of water is too much. Plaisant all of my training in cognitive biases told me that was faulty thinking. I would Si spending $2 connaissance the water—a price I was willing to pay, as had already been established. So I put the money in and got the water, which I happily drank.
The anchoring effect is our tendency to rely too heavily nous the first piece of récente offered, particularly if that récente is presented in numeric form, when making decisions, estimates, or predictions. This is the reason negotiators start with a number that is deliberately too low or too high: They know that number will “anchor” the subsequent dealings.
In Kahneman's subdivision those intuitions have been converted into theoretical propositions, each meticulously researched in well designed experiments. Clearly, this is at least one difference between me and a Nobel Prize winning researcher.